![]() |
||
|
Cold Wars and Flight Suits From: "Mimi Nguyen" <mimin@uiuc.edu> Dear list members, I apologize if this is a bit incoherent (I'm writing this at 5 a.m.), Not being a historian of the war, I was wondering, with this quote, My second question is much more random. I have a dim memory of an essay Best, Mimi Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:09:00 -0800 (PST) I find the first a very interesting question. I have often been struck On the second question, could you perhaps be refering to Nguyen Cao Ky, Cheers, Joe Hannah Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:10:10 -0500 Dear Mimi, I don't know which question is more interesting, Cold War or flight suits. But, sadly, I have answers to neither. On state mobilization, though, from the little that I've come across, I suspect it wasn't until at least the early or mid-1960s that the RVN really appropriated the American discourse to the degree that it's remained known today. (I'm thinking of Nguyen Ba Chung's comment in another post on how Americans as well as many overseas Vietnamese still perceive the war via Cold War prism.) Of course, the "Free World vs. Communist Bloc" dichotomy was already in place ever since the US got involved in the First Indochinese War. But I don't think it was a primary concern for noncommunists who were more occupied with surviving Viet Minh suppression at the time, while also navigating through French and American dominance. Then in the few years following As a side note, I think that the DRV was also preoccupied with postcolonial concerns - land reform, Marxist interpretation of the Tay Son and Nguyen dynasty, North-firsters winning over South-firsters, etc. But there might well be more to it, including a desire to expand communist revolutions in the region. Looking at a bunch of documents between the DRV and Mao's China in the 1960s and 1970s, Stein Tonnesson thought that the domino theory was both right and wrong, in that the two sides indicated intention to spread communism in the The essay and documents are on PDF at Back to the RVN, one of the best studies on related topics is Matt Masur's dissertation on cultural nation-building under the Diem regime. Matt surveyed a large amount of documents at Archives II in HCMC and the National Archives outside Washington, DC, and concluded that there was a huge discrepancy between cultural programs promoted by Diem on the one hand and the US Information Agency on the other hand. The discrepancy could well be indicative of the different Cold War discourses between the US and the RVN - though, again, my opinion is no more than impressionistic. There are other recent dissertations dealing with similar themes (Ed Miller, Jessica Elkind, Jessica Chapman, etc.) But I single out Matt's because it's available online for free from Ohio State University, though I don't have the link at hand. ~Tuan Mimi Nguyen <mimin@uiuc.edu> Dear Tuan, Joe and other list members, Thank you both for the thoughtful replies! And yes, it's because the Cold War prism does continue to have political salience (though arguably the degree to which it does still carry weight is debatable) for overseas Vietnamese that I'm wondering how and when Cold War discourses entered into southern Vietnamese political language and imagery during the war. But this was very helpful, and I'll definitely look into those dissertations you mentioned! I'm still hoping for an answer on the flight suit essay, which I swear also included a discussion about pith helmets. It probably was about Nguyen Cao Ky, though! Best, Philip Taylor <philip.taylor@anu.edu.au> You might find something in Terry Rambo's essay "Black Flight Suits and Philip Taylor quang@qxpham.com <quang@qxpham.com> http://www.qxpham.com/83rd%20SOG.htm http://www.qxpham.com/American.Advisors.514.htm Former Air Marshal and Premier Nguyen Cao Ky. See photos above. One of his ex-wives was a stewardess/flight attendant for Air Vietnam and she used to don black sunglasses and flight suits as well. Best regards, Mimi Nguyen <mimin@uiuc.edu> Philip, That's it! I knew I had read an essay about flight suits somewhere. Thanks so much! Best, Nu-Anh Tran <tran_n_a@yahoo.com> Dear list, I also find the question of American Cold War discourse used in the RVN very interesting. In my (admittedly limited) research using RVN newspapers from the latter half of the 1960s, I was struck by the repeated usages of terms such as “Free World,” “Iron Curtain,” “bastion of freedom in Southeast Asia,” “bulwark of freedom,” “nation-building,” and “communist bloc.” These terms were used in articles by regular writers as well as in letters to the editor (and they are used with surprising frequency among some overseas Vietnamese too). It seemed to me that they were considered by these writers and readers to be universally recognized terms rather than distinctively political terms or translated terms (linguistically or politically), but that does not necessarily mean of course that they meant the same things to southern Vietnamese as they did to Americans. Besides the question of when and how American Cold War discourse entered and filtered through the RVN, one might also ask if American Cold War discourse in effect became RVN Cold War discourse or if there was a distinctive RVN Cold War political rhetoric. Tuan Hoang <thoang1@nd.edu> Nu-Anh mentions the Ben Hai, and I'd like to add that for all the differences among the Vietnamese sides about the war and partition, there was at least one thing that they'd have agreed unanimously: the river was a symbol of national shame. A researcher trying to grasp the mind of Vietnamese during the war should mine the countless references to it in wartime print, music, film, etc. Tuan Hoang <thoang1@nd.edu> Quick clarification: I didn't mean to dispute what Nu-Anh was saying about the Ben Hai song in 1954 that encourages northerners to head south. In fact, I think her point is important, esp. because English-language interpretations of this issue have been so American-centric (e.g., saying that the migration was basically the handiworks of the US), that they typically left out Vietnamese agency in promoting the move. What I'd meant to say is, the Ben Hai became a symbol of shame as Vietnamese realized the partition was permanent instead of temporary. Peter Hansen <phansen@ourladys.org.au> Couldn't agree with you more, Anh Tuan, about the overplaying of the
|
||