Course evaluation

Office of Educational Assessment

IAS Online

Course evaluation

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	Very Poor
The course as a whole was:
The course content was:
The instructors contribution to student learning was:
The effectiveness of the delivery format was:
Clarity of course objectives was:
Clarity of student responsibilities and requirements was:
Relevance of required readings (Web sites, articles, texts, etc.) was:
Relevance of activities and assignments to module goals was:
Timeliness of instructor response to assignments was:
Quality/helpfulness of instructor feedback was:
Encouragement given studnets to express themselves was:
Availability of extra help when needed was:
Opportunity for practicing what was learned was:
Reasonableness of assigned work was:
Relationship of examinations to material emphasized in the course was:
Instructors ability to solve unexpected problems was:
Quality of equipment was:

Relative to other college courses you have taken:

	Much Higher	Average	Much Lower

Do your expect your grade in this course to be:
The intrllectual challenge presented was:
The amount of effort you put into this course was:
The amount of effort to succeed int theis course was:
Your involvement in this course (doing assignments, etc.) was:

On average, how many hours per week have you spent on this course, including working on-line, doing readings, reviewing nores, writing papers and any other course related work?

Under 2	6-7	12-13	18-19
2-3	8-9	14-15	20-21
4-5	10-11	16-17	22 or more

From the total average hours above, how many do you consider were valuable in advancing your education?

Under 2	6-7	12-13	18-19
2-3	8-9	14-15	20-21
4-5	10-11	16-17	22 or more

Was this course intellectually stimulating? Did it stretch your thinking?

Yes

No Why or why not?

What aspects of this course contributed most to your learning?

What aspects of this course detracted from your learning?

What suggestions do you have for improving the course?

Return to Implementing Assessment Measures